M&A Deal Navigator

中美跨境并购
每一步
都有路线图
Cross-Border M&A
A Roadmap for
Every Step

并购不是单个文件的签署,而是一场跨越6-12个月的协同作战。从制定收购计划、组建顾问团队,到尽职调查、监管审批、税务规划与交割——每个阶段都有专属工具、清单和实战资源。 M&A isn't a single signing — it's a 6-to-12 month campaign. From acquisition planning and assembling your advisor team, to due diligence, regulatory approvals, tax structuring, and closing — every stage has tools, checklists, and real-world resources.

00
🗺️
制定计划Planning
Strategy · Budget
01
🤝
组建团队Advisors
IB · Lawyer
02
🎯
寻找标的Sourcing
Proprietary · Auction
03
📝
$
IOI
Non-binding
04
🤝
LOI
Exclusivity
05
🔍
尽职调查Due Diligence
Legal · Finance
06
🏛️
监管税务Regulatory
CFIUS · HSR
07
交割整合Closing
SPA · Handover
滑动查看全部阶段Scroll to see all stages
Stage 00 · 制定收购计划Acquisition Planning

先想清楚
为什么要买
Start with Why
You're Buying

一笔成功的并购,80%的决定在正式启动之前就已做出。战略定位是否清晰、预算是否现实、团队是否有能力整合——这些问题没想清楚,就会在后面的每一步付出加倍代价。 80% of a successful deal is decided before you ever pick up the phone. If your strategic thesis isn't sharp, your budget isn't realistic, or your team can't integrate — every later stage costs you twice as much.

最常见的失败模式:"看到一个好机会就出手。"没有清晰的投资标准和估值纪律,结果要么买贵、要么买错——整合阶段才发现业务根本合不上。 The most common failure mode: "We saw a good opportunity and jumped." Without clear investment criteria and valuation discipline, you either overpay or buy the wrong thing — and only discover the integration mismatch after closing.
工具 & 资源Tools & Resources
🎯
Evonne原创 · Framework
收购战略框架:5个必答问题 Acquisition Thesis Framework: 5 Questions You Must Answer

签约前,请先用这5个问题自我拷问。答不清楚的话,现在就停下来。 Before you sign anything, work through these five questions. If you can't answer them crisply, stop now.

  • 01 战略逻辑:这笔收购解决了什么问题?是买客户、买技术、买产能,还是买现金流?一句话说不清,就是没想清楚。Strategic logic: What problem does this deal solve? Customers, tech, capacity, or cash flow? If you can't say it in one sentence, you haven't figured it out.
  • 02 估值上限:在什么价格之上,这笔交易就不值得做?提前定好"walk away price",避免被谈判情绪绑架。Valuation ceiling: Above what price does this deal stop making sense? Set your walk-away number in advance — so negotiation emotion doesn't drag you past it.
  • 03 资金来源:自有资金、银行贷款、股权融资、卖方融资——每种结构对税务、控制权、时间表的影响都完全不同。Funding source: Cash, bank debt, equity, seller financing — each structure has radically different implications for tax, control, and timeline.
  • 04 监管风险:目标公司是否涉及关键技术、敏感数据或基础设施?CFIUS、出口管制、反垄断——这些审查可能直接杀死交易。Regulatory risk: Does the target touch critical tech, sensitive data, or infrastructure? CFIUS, export control, antitrust — any of these can kill the deal outright.
  • 05 整合计划:谁来当CEO?核心团队留不留?IT系统怎么合并?整合计划不在LOI之前写好,交割后就是一地鸡毛。Integration plan: Who runs the company post-close? Does the founding team stay? How do IT systems merge? If integration isn't mapped before the LOI, post-close is a mess.
Evonne 建议:Evonne's tip: 把这5个问题的答案写成一份一页纸的"Deal Thesis Memo",作为后续所有决策的锚点。当团队意见分歧时,这份文件就是仲裁标准。 Turn these answers into a one-page "Deal Thesis Memo" that anchors every subsequent decision. When your team disagrees later, this document is the tiebreaker.
💰
Cost Reality
并购总成本的真实构成 The Real Cost of an M&A Deal

只算标的公司的购买价,是最大的预算误区。一个中型跨境交易的"隐性成本"通常占到购买价的 5–12%。 Budgeting only for the purchase price is the biggest planning mistake. "Hidden" costs in a mid-market cross-border deal typically run 5–12% on top.

  • 投行费用:1–2% 交易金额Investment bank fees: 1–2% of deal value
  • 律师费用:$200K–$2M+(视复杂度)Legal fees: $200K–$2M+ (depending on complexity)
  • 财务/税务尽调:$100K–$500KFinancial/tax DD: $100K–$500K
  • CFIUS/反垄断申报费:$30K–$300KCFIUS/antitrust filing fees: $30K–$300K
  • 整合成本:5–10% 交易金额(常被低估)Integration costs: 5–10% of deal value (often underestimated)
🎯
Checklist
标的筛选标准清单 Target Screening Checklist

点击勾选已确认项目: Check off as you confirm each:

  • 标的规模与预算匹配(EBITDA倍数合理)Size matches budget (reasonable EBITDA multiple) HIGH
  • 行业与自身战略协同Industry fits strategic thesis HIGH
  • 初步CFIUS风险可接受Preliminary CFIUS risk acceptable HIGH
  • 卖方有明确的出售意愿Seller has clear intent to sell MEDIUM
  • 文化/管理风格大致匹配Culture/management style roughly aligned MEDIUM
Stage 01 · 组建顾问团队Hire Advisors

顾问团队的质量
决定交易的上限
Your Advisors Set
the Ceiling of the Deal

在跨境并购中,好的顾问能帮你多赚一倍、少亏一半;差的顾问会让你付出看不见的代价。投行、律师、会计——三者必须协同作战,而不是各自为政。 In cross-border M&A, the right advisors can double your upside and halve your downside — while the wrong ones cost you in ways you'll never see. Your banker, lawyer, and accountant must work as one team, not in silos.

💼
常见误区:"律师等到有草案了再找就行。"实际上,最关键的决定——交易结构、税务架构、谈判策略——都在签LOI之前就锁死了。等你有SPA草案的时候,律师能做的只是"damage control"。 Common mistake: "We'll bring in a lawyer once we have a draft." By then it's too late — deal structure, tax structuring, and negotiation posture are already locked in before the LOI. Once there's a draft SPA, your lawyer is doing damage control, not deal-shaping.
工具 & 资源Tools & Resources
🧭
Evonne原创 · Roles Map
三类顾问各自负责什么? Who Does What on Your Deal Team?
角色Role 核心价值Core Value 介入时点When to Engage
投资银行Investment Bank 标的寻源、估值建模、过程管理、价格谈判Target sourcing, valuation, process management, price negotiation 战略规划后,寻标的前After strategy, before sourcing
交易律师Deal Lawyer 结构设计、法律尽调、合同谈判、监管合规Structure design, legal DD, contract negotiation, regulatory 和投行同时,或更早Same time as IB, or earlier
税务会计Tax Accountant 税务架构、财务尽调、QoE报告、交割计算Tax structure, financial DD, QoE reports, closing calcs 签LOI前,和律师同步Before LOI, in sync with lawyer
公关/游说PR / Government Relations 敏感行业需要,CFIUS预沟通For sensitive sectors, CFIUS pre-briefings 视风险而定,越早越好Risk-dependent, the earlier the better
Evonne 建议:Evonne's tip: 中资买家最容易犯的错是"只请中国律师"——对美国交易惯例、监管机构沟通、本土判例都有盲区。跨境交易至少需要一位在美国本土执业、同时懂中方客户沟通习惯的主办律师。 Chinese buyers most often make the mistake of "using only Chinese lawyers" — creating blind spots on US deal customs, regulator communications, and domestic case law. Cross-border deals need at least one lead counsel who practices in the US but understands Chinese client communication.
Interview Guide
面试律师/投行的10个关键问题 10 Questions to Ask Before Hiring
  • 01 · 最近18个月做过几笔类似交易?How many similar deals in the past 18 months?
  • 02 · 谁是主办合伙人?谁做日常执行?Who's the lead partner? Who does day-to-day?
  • 03 · 收费结构(小时/固定/成功费)?Fee structure (hourly/fixed/success)?
  • 04 · 是否代表过卖方,有没有对立经验?Ever represented sellers — do you see both sides?
  • 05 · 有无利益冲突?Any conflicts of interest?
  • 06 · 中文沟通能力如何?Chinese-language capacity?
  • 07 · CFIUS经验?最近成功/被否案例?CFIUS experience? Recent wins/blocks?
  • 08 · 是否愿意书面提供参考客户?Will you provide written references?
  • 09 · 对这笔交易的初步风险判断?Preliminary risk read on this deal?
  • 10 · 你什么情况下会建议放弃?When would you advise walking away?
📄
Red Flags
委托合同里的4个红灯条款 4 Red Flags in Engagement Letters
  • 无上限的小时费。Uncapped hourly fees. 总要谈一个预估范围和超支通知机制。Always negotiate an estimate and an overrun notification.
  • 自动顺延的尾款。Auto-extending trailers. "后续交易自动按此费率"——不要签。"Future deals default to this rate" — don't sign.
  • 不对称的免责条款。Asymmetric indemnification. 顾问完全免责,客户全赔。Advisor fully indemnified, client fully exposed.
  • 终止条款不对等。One-sided termination. 你要能在合理时间内解聘顾问。You must be able to terminate on reasonable notice.
Stage 02 · 独家交易 vs 竞标Proprietary vs Auction

你是在独家谈判
还是在竞标场里抢标的?
Are You in an Exclusive
or Fighting in an Auction?

交易获取方式决定了你的节奏、筹码和价格。独家谈判更从容但需要信任关系;竞标场效率高但价格水分大。两种路径的策略完全不同。 How you source a deal decides your pace, leverage, and price. Proprietary deals are calmer but need trust; auctions move fast but pump up price. The strategy for each is completely different.

⚖️
买家最容易上的当:以为自己在做独家谈判,结果卖方投行同时在跑一个"隐形auction"。你以为自己是唯一选择,实际上是在做"stalking horse"。 Where buyers get played: You think it's a proprietary deal, but the seller's banker is actually running a quiet parallel auction. You think you're the chosen one — you're actually the stalking horse.
工具 & 资源Tools & Resources
⚖️
Evonne原创 · Comparison
独家 vs 竞标:5个维度对比 Proprietary vs Auction: 5-Dimension Comparison
维度Dimension 独家谈判Proprietary 竞标拍卖Auction
价格Price 通常偏低(无竞争)Lower (no competition) 偏高(溢价 10–30%)Higher (10–30% premium)
节奏Pace 由买卖双方自控Both sides control 卖方投行主导,deadline密集Banker-driven, deadline-heavy
尽调深度DD Depth 充分时间Ample time 压缩到 2–4 周Compressed to 2–4 weeks
谈判筹码Leverage 相对对等Roughly equal 卖方主导,买方让步多Seller-dominant, buyer concedes more
成功率Close Rate 通常较高Generally higher 30–50%(淘汰率高)30–50% (high elimination)
Evonne 建议:Evonne's tip: 第一次做跨境并购的买家,尽量选"proprietary"路线——避免在陌生的美国竞标规则里付出"学费"。如果必须进auction,至少请一位做过多轮auction的美国律师同行。 First-time cross-border buyers should lean proprietary — avoid paying tuition in a US auction you don't understand. If you must enter an auction, bring a US lawyer who's run several before.
🔨
Auction Playbook
典型auction流程拆解 Anatomy of a Typical Auction
  • Round 1 · 初筛:Screening: 签NDA、收CIM、提交IOI(2-3周)NDA, CIM, submit IOI (2-3 weeks)
  • Round 2 · 短名单:Shortlist: 管理层见面、DataRoom、提交final bid(4-6周)Mgmt meetings, data room, final bid (4-6 weeks)
  • Round 3 · 独家谈判:Exclusivity: 中标方进入LOI,锁排他期Winner enters LOI, lock exclusivity
  • 签约交割:Sign & close: 确定性尽调、SPA谈判、监管、交割(8-16周)Confirmatory DD, SPA, regulatory, close (8-16 weeks)
♟️
Tactics
竞标中的3个加分动作 3 Moves That Win an Auction
  • 交易确定性。Certainty of close. 卖方怕"签了又黄",愿意为确定性降价。无融资条件、CFIUS已预判、快速批准——都是加分项。Sellers fear a failed close and will discount for certainty. No financing contingency, pre-screened CFIUS, quick internal approvals — all pluses.
  • 管理层关系。Management relationships. 在IOI前就和目标CEO建立信任,有时比多出5%的报价更有效。Building CEO trust before the IOI often beats paying 5% more.
  • 对卖方痛点的定制方案。Solve the seller's real pain. 老股东想套现?管理层想留任?家族企业想传承品牌?对症下药。Shareholders want liquidity? Mgmt wants to stay? Family wants legacy? Address it directly.
Stage 03 · 初步意向函 IOIIndication of Interest

一份一页纸
决定你能否进下一轮
One Single Page
Decides if You Advance

IOI 不是合同——它没有约束力,但决定了卖方如何看待你。一份写得好的IOI,能让你在不付出任何法律代价的情况下进入短名单;写得差的IOI,连第一轮都过不了。 An IOI isn't a contract — it has no legal force, but it decides how the seller sees you. A well-crafted IOI gets you shortlisted with zero legal exposure; a weak one doesn't clear round one.

📝
中资买家常犯的错:把IOI当成"先占坑"随便写,或者反过来,把它写成一份 detailed LOI。两种做法都会失分——卖方看重的是"诚意+执行力"的平衡。 Where Chinese buyers get it wrong: Treating the IOI either as a "save my spot" throwaway, or over-engineering it into a detailed LOI. Both lose you points — sellers want to see a balance of intent and execution capacity.
工具 & 资源Tools & Resources
📄
Evonne原创 · Template
一份标准IOI的7个必备元素 7 Must-Have Elements of a Strong IOI
  • 01 买方简介。Buyer profile. 公司背景、过往交易记录、战略逻辑。让卖方一眼看出你"为什么要买"。Company background, deal track record, strategic thesis. Signal "why you're buying" on page one.
  • 02 估值区间。Valuation range. 通常给出一个区间(如 $80M–$100M),附简要估值逻辑。Usually a range (e.g., $80M–$100M) with a brief rationale.
  • 03 资金来源。Source of funds. 现金/贷款/股权?有无融资条件?这是卖方最关心的"确定性"指标。Cash, debt, equity? Any financing contingency? Sellers read this as the certainty signal.
  • 04 交易结构偏好。Preferred structure. 资产收购 vs 股权收购?现金 vs 股权对价?Asset vs stock deal? Cash vs stock consideration?
  • 05 所需尽调范围。DD scope requested. 商业、法律、财务、税务、ESG——告诉卖方你需要什么。Commercial, legal, financial, tax, ESG — tell the seller what you'll need.
  • 06 监管预判。Regulatory outlook. CFIUS、反垄断、行业许可——提前表态"我们已做评估"。CFIUS, antitrust, industry approvals — signal "we've pre-assessed."
  • 07 关键假设与免责声明。Key assumptions & disclaimer. "基于公开信息"、"无约束力"、"待董事会批准"。"Based on public info," "non-binding," "subject to board approval."
Evonne 建议:Evonne's tip: IOI最好控制在1-2页。语气要有信心但不能过度承诺。每一句话都会成为你后面谈判时的"承诺基线"——说过的话,收不回来。 Keep your IOI to 1-2 pages. Confident, but don't over-commit. Every sentence becomes a promise baseline for later negotiations — you can't walk back what you put on paper.
📊
Valuation
如何给出一个"合理"的估值区间 How to Set a "Defensible" Valuation Range
  • 用3种方法交叉验证:EBITDA倍数、DCF、交易可比Triangulate with 3 methods: EBITDA multiple, DCF, precedent transactions
  • 区间上限 = "努力够一下"的价格,下限 = "不亏本"的价格High end = "stretch" price, low end = "no regret" price
  • 留 10–15% 的尽调调整空间Leave 10–15% headroom for DD adjustments
  • 考虑卖方预期:CIM里的"EBITDA"通常已经调高Discount the seller's "adjusted EBITDA" in the CIM
⚠️
Pitfalls
IOI阶段的4个常见陷阱 4 Common Traps at the IOI Stage
  • 报价过高抢名次:进了下一轮却拉不回价格。Lowballing to advance: You get shortlisted but can't climb back down on price.
  • 承诺"无CFIUS风险":这几乎不可能对中资买家成立。"No CFIUS risk" promises: Almost never credible for Chinese buyers.
  • 不写"无约束力":部分表述可能被解释为合同要约。Skipping "non-binding": Some phrasing may be read as an offer.
  • 遗漏董事会批准条件:必须写明最终决定需内部批准。No board-approval caveat: Must flag that final decision needs internal approval.
Stage 04 · 意向书 LOILetter of Intent

LOI 是交易的
第二场真正的谈判
The LOI Is the Deal's
Second Real Negotiation

很多人以为LOI只是"先签个东西",然后大事到SPA再谈。错。LOI里的每一个关键条款——排他期、no-shop、分手费、关键交易假设——在SPA阶段几乎无法再改。LOI没谈好,SPA的空间就被提前锁死。 Many think the LOI is a placeholder — "we'll fight it out in the SPA." Wrong. Every key LOI term — exclusivity, no-shop, break fees, core deal assumptions — is nearly impossible to move in the SPA phase. A weak LOI locks down your SPA room before you ever start.

🔐
最昂贵的 LOI 错误:接受一个"60天排他期+无条件分手费"的LOI,然后在尽调发现重大问题时,卖方以"你签了排他期"为由,拒绝下调价格或调整结构。此时你只有两个选择——付原价买,或者白白烧掉几百万法律费用。 The most expensive LOI mistake: Accepting "60-day exclusivity + unconditional break fee" — then in DD you find serious issues, and the seller refuses to reprice or restructure because "you're locked in." Now you either pay the original price or walk with millions in sunk legal fees.
工具 & 资源Tools & Resources
🗝️
Evonne原创 · Clause Guide
LOI必谈的5个关键条款 5 Must-Negotiate Clauses in Every LOI
条款Clause 买方立场Buyer Position 常见妥协Common Landing
排他期Exclusivity 60天足够尽调60 days enough for DD 45–90天,可延展45–90 days, extendable
No-shopNo-shop 绝对不接洽其他买家No contact with other buyers 允许"被动接收" offerPassive receipt of offers allowed
分手费Break fee 仅在买方无正当理由退出时触发Only if buyer walks without cause 1–3% 交易金额,有限情形1–3% of deal value, limited triggers
尽调合作DD cooperation 全面数据访问和管理层面谈Full data access + mgmt meetings 限定范围 + NDA 保护Scoped + under NDA
价格调整条件Price adjustment 保留因重大问题调价权Keep right to reprice on material issues 限定"material adverse"情形Limited to "material adverse" events
Evonne 建议:Evonne's tip: LOI 里最容易被买方"轻率签署"的两项是分手费和排他期。分手费一定要和卖方达成对等(双向触发),排他期建议不超过 60 天并允许因尽调重大发现而终止。 Break fees and exclusivity are where buyers most often sign too casually. Make break fees reciprocal, cap exclusivity at ~60 days, and reserve the right to terminate for material DD findings.
🧩
Legal Structure
LOI里哪些部分有约束力? Which LOI Terms Are Actually Binding?
  • 无约束力的部分:Non-binding: 价格、交易结构、结束条件Price, structure, closing conditions
  • 有约束力的部分:Binding: 排他期、保密、费用分摊、适用法律、争议解决Exclusivity, confidentiality, cost allocation, governing law, dispute resolution
  • 灰色地带:Gray area: "本着诚信谈判"—— 看起来软,实际可能被法院视为合同义务"Negotiate in good faith" — soft-sounding but courts can read it as a contractual duty
⚙️
Certainty Levers
买方保留的4个"逃生通道" 4 Exit Ramps Buyers Should Preserve
  • 尽调完成条件("subject to satisfactory DD")DD satisfaction clause
  • 监管批准条件(CFIUS、HSR、行业审批)Regulatory approval condition
  • 董事会/股东最终批准Board/shareholder final approval
  • 融资确定性(如适用)Financing certainty (if applicable)
Stage 05 · 尽职调查Due Diligence

尽调是
最后的重新定价机会
DD Is Your Last
Chance to Reprice

尽职调查不只是"检查一下"——它是系统性地发现那些会影响价格、结构、甚至要不要继续做的问题。尽调做不扎实,交割后才暴雷,代价可能是整笔交易的几倍。 Due diligence isn't just a "check the boxes" exercise — it's the systematic discovery of problems that can change price, structure, or whether you proceed at all. Weak DD means post-closing surprises that can cost multiples of the deal value.

🔍
中资买家的尽调盲区:过度依赖卖方data room里的"官方材料",忽略了公开数据库、员工访谈、客户电话、供应商核实等独立信息源。真正重要的问题,往往藏在数据室之外。 The Chinese buyer DD blind spot: Over-reliance on the seller's data room "official materials," ignoring independent sources — public databases, employee interviews, customer calls, supplier verification. The real issues usually live outside the data room.
工具 & 资源Tools & Resources
📋
Evonne原创 · Master Checklist
跨境并购尽调清单 · 法律维度 Cross-Border M&A Legal DD Checklist
  • 公司组织文件、股权结构、子公司链条Corporate docs, cap table, subsidiary chain HIGH
  • 重大合同清单(客户、供应商、贷款、租赁)Material contracts (customer, supplier, debt, lease) HIGH
  • 变更控制条款(change of control clauses)Change-of-control clauses HIGH
  • 知识产权权属与侵权风险IP ownership & infringement risk HIGH
  • 员工合同、期权计划、遣散责任Employment, option plans, severance liability MEDIUM
  • 未决诉讼、监管调查、政府处罚Litigation, regulatory inquiries, sanctions HIGH
  • 数据隐私、AI合规、出口管制Data privacy, AI compliance, export control MEDIUM
  • 房地产、环境责任、保险覆盖Real estate, environmental, insurance MEDIUM
  • 关联方交易、潜在利益冲突Related-party deals, conflicts of interest MEDIUM
  • 税务申报合规与潜在税务负债Tax compliance & contingent tax liabilities HIGH
Evonne 建议:Evonne's tip: 每个HIGH项目如果发现异常,都要转成一张"Issues List"并对应到具体的SPA条款(价格调整、特别陈述保证、托管金、特别赔偿)。不要把发现藏在脚注里。 Every HIGH-priority finding should go on an "Issues List" mapped to a specific SPA lever — price adjustment, special reps, escrow, specific indemnity. Don't bury findings in footnotes.
🚩
Red Flag Map
5个"红灯级"发现 5 Deal-Killer Findings
  • 🚩 单一客户超过40%收入Single customer >40% of revenue
  • 🚩 核心IP权属不清或存在争议Core IP ownership unclear or disputed
  • 🚩 未披露的重大未决诉讼Undisclosed material litigation
  • 🚩 税务申报存在系统性瑕疵Systemic tax compliance issues
  • 🚩 关键合同含限制性change of controlCritical contracts with restrictive change-of-control
🔎
Outside-In DD
数据室之外的6个信息源 6 Sources Outside the Data Room
  • PACER(联邦诉讼数据库)PACER (federal litigation database)
  • 州级UCC/留置权查询State UCC / lien search
  • OFAC/BIS制裁与出口管制筛查OFAC/BIS sanctions & export screening
  • 员工访谈(LinkedIn 离职员工)Employee interviews (LinkedIn alumni)
  • 前五大客户/供应商电话核实Top-5 customer/supplier calls
  • 行业记者与第三方市场报告Industry press & third-party market reports
Stage 06 · 监管审批与税务架构Regulatory & Tax Structuring

CFIUS 和税务
决定了一切
CFIUS & Tax
Decide Everything

对中资买家而言,2026年的美国并购环境有两座"看不见的墙"——CFIUS国家安全审查和不断收紧的外国所得税规则。提前评估、提前规划、提前沟通,是避免交易被"拦腰截断"的唯一方法。 For Chinese buyers in 2026, US M&A has two invisible walls — CFIUS national-security review and increasingly tight foreign-earnings tax rules. Early assessment, structuring, and regulator engagement are the only ways to avoid a deal being cut in half.

🏛️
2026 年的新现实:CFIUS 审查面越来越宽,"关键技术""敏感数据""基础设施"的定义不断扩大;而美国对外国所得的征税规则(包括 BEAT、GILTI、FIRPTA)也在持续收紧。不提前把这两条拉通,任何结构都只是纸上谈兵。 The 2026 reality: CFIUS scope is widening — "critical tech," "sensitive data," and "infrastructure" keep expanding. Meanwhile US taxation of foreign earnings (BEAT, GILTI, FIRPTA) keeps tightening. Without running these two tracks together from day one, any structure is just paper.
工具 & 资源Tools & Resources
🛡️
Interactive · CFIUS Screener
CFIUS 风险快速筛查器CFIUS Risk Quick Screener

5个问题,3分钟预判这笔交易的 CFIUS 暴露度。仅供初步参考,不构成法律意见。 5 questions, 3 minutes — get a preliminary CFIUS exposure read. For screening only; not legal advice.

1 / 5
⚠️
Sensitive Sectors
CFIUS 高敏感行业清单 CFIUS High-Sensitivity Sectors
  • 半导体、AI、量子计算Semiconductors, AI, quantum
  • 生物技术、基因数据、医疗设备Biotech, genomic data, medical devices
  • 关键矿产、能源、航天Critical minerals, energy, aerospace
  • 云计算、数据中心、网络安全Cloud, data centers, cybersecurity
  • 涉军用途、双用技术Military / dual-use tech
  • 港口、机场等基础设施邻近资产Assets near ports, airports, critical infra
💹
Tax Structure
中资买家常见税务架构 Common Structures for Chinese Buyers
  • 美国 C-Corp 控股:US C-Corp holdco: 简单直接,但股息汇出受 WHT 影响。Simple but dividends face withholding.
  • 香港/新加坡中间控股:HK/SG intermediate holdco: 需满足经济实质,规避反滥用规则。Needs economic substance, watch anti-abuse rules.
  • 资产 vs 股权收购:Asset vs stock purchase: 税基步进 vs 税负连带,权衡折中。Step-up basis vs assumed liabilities — trade-offs differ.
Timeline Reality
美国并购审批时间表(2026 实战版) US M&A Approval Timeline (2026 Reality)
审批项Approval 典型时间Typical Duration 触发条件Trigger
CFIUS (短表Declaration) 30 days TID业务 + 外资收购TID + foreign acquirer
CFIUS (长表Full Notice) 45+45+15 days 高敏感交易High-sensitivity deals
HSR 反垄断Antitrust 30 天初审days initial 超过门槛交易额Above threshold
行业许可Industry Approvals 因行业而异Varies by industry 金融、通信、能源、国防Finance, telecom, energy, defense
中国境内审批China Outbound Approval 1–3 个月months ODI 备案/核准ODI filing/approval
Stage 07 · 交割与整合Closing & Integration

签了字
只是新故事的开始
Signing Is Just the
Start of the Next Story

交割日之后的90天,决定了这笔交易是"价值创造"还是"价值毁灭"。SPA 的每一条陈述与保证、每一笔调整金、每一次"交割条件"都是为了让这个新故事顺利开始——而整合计划则决定了它能不能一直写下去。 The 90 days after closing decide whether this deal creates or destroys value. Every SPA rep, every adjustment, every closing condition exists so the next chapter can start cleanly — and your integration plan decides whether it keeps going.

🎯
交割后的"第一个月危机":核心员工流失、客户流失、IT系统脱节、合规漏洞暴露——统计显示,超过 60% 的并购"价值损失"发生在交割后前 90 天。整合计划必须在交割前就已到位。 The "first 30 days" crisis: Key employees leave, customers walk, IT systems detach, compliance gaps surface. Studies show over 60% of M&A value loss happens in the first 90 days after close. Integration must be ready on closing day — not drafted on it.
工具 & 资源Tools & Resources
Evonne原创 · Closing Day
交割日必办清单(14项) Closing Day Checklist (14 items)
  • 所有 Closing Conditions 已满足并书面确认All closing conditions satisfied & confirmed in writingHIGH
  • 监管批准(CFIUS、HSR、行业许可)到位Regulatory approvals in handHIGH
  • SPA、披露函、附件全部签署SPA, disclosure letter, exhibits executedHIGH
  • 交割价格计算、调整金与托管金确认Closing calc, adjustments, escrow confirmedHIGH
  • 资金到位并按交割流程表支付Funds wired per closing flowHIGH
  • 股权/资产过户文件签署和登记Transfer docs signed & recordedHIGH
  • 原董事/高管辞职书签署Director/officer resignations signedMEDIUM
  • 新董事会组建与章程修订New board constituted, charter updatedMEDIUM
  • 银行账户签字权变更Bank signing authority updatedMEDIUM
  • 员工、客户、供应商通知Notices to employees, customers, suppliersMEDIUM
  • 保险过户、D&O覆盖Insurance transfer, D&O coverageMEDIUM
  • 交割后30天/90天整合启动Integration kickoff within 30/90 daysMEDIUM
  • W&I 保险生效通知W&I insurance boundLOW
  • 交割材料归档、各方存档副本Closing binder archived for all partiesLOW
🧭
Integration 90-day
交割后 90 天整合地图 90-Day Integration Map
  • Day 1:Day 1: 全员通告、CEO演讲、客户/供应商信件All-hands, CEO note, customer/supplier letters
  • Week 1:Week 1: 核心员工1对1、留任协议签署Key employee 1:1s, retention agreements
  • Day 30:Day 30: 整合委员会启动、关键指标仪表盘Integration steering committee, KPI dashboard live
  • Day 90:Day 90: 第一次"交易复盘"会议,调整剧本First "deal retrospective," recalibrate playbook
⚖️
Dispute Traps
交割后最常见的4类争议 4 Most Common Post-Close Disputes
  • 营运资本调整。Working capital adjustment. 计算口径分歧几乎是必发。Definitional disputes are nearly universal.
  • Earn-out 触发条件。Earn-out triggers. 指标定义模糊是主要原因。Vague metric definitions are the usual cause.
  • R&W违约索赔。R&W breach claims. "Material" 的定义经常成为争议点。"Material" definitions become the battleground.
  • 核心员工离职。Key employee attrition. 留任条款和非竞争条款的执行。Retention & non-compete enforcement.
Deal Navigator

有正在进行的交易?让我们谈谈 A Live Deal on Your Desk? Let's Talk

每一笔跨境并购都是独一无二的。免费 30 分钟沟通,看看我能否帮你把路线图落到实处。 Every cross-border deal is unique. Book a complimentary 30-minute call — let's see if I can help you turn this roadmap into action.